1. ESRC Genomics Network (archive)
  2. Gengage
  3. The Human Genre Project

Cesagen · News

Call for abstracts for Cesagen panel at 4S Conference

27.02.2013

Introduction

This panel provides an opportunity for those involved in the practice, study and evaluation of public engagement in science and technology, to build a shared discourse around the value, benefits and quality of public engagement.

Story

Call for open panel 14 - Evaluating the Quality of Public Deliberation on S&T at 4S, October 9 12, 2013

14. Evaluating the Quality of Public Deliberation on S & TIn the context of continued global financial instability and the consequent parsimony and/or conservatism of national governments in funding science R&D, public engagement in science and technology, remains a priority investment. In the UK context for instance, the UK government's ongoing patronage of the Sciencewise programme of public dialogue concerning emergent and/or controversial science for policy purposes, signifies a value determination of public engagement, albeit one arguably narrowly and instrumentally conceived.

However, there is little evidence beyond supposition or anecdote, which reliably informs and articulates the benefit(s) of public engagement to policy-making communities and by extension, the electorate as both participants within and benefactors of the anticipated or imagined outcomes of public engagement activity. By way of response, evaluators of public engagement activity are beginning to focus more assiduously on the quality of public engagement processes more generally, surpassing the normative and grossly simplistic depiction of public engagement as an inherently “good thing”.

This panel provides an opportunity for those involved in the practice, study and evaluation of public engagement in science and technology, to build a shared discourse around the value, benefits and quality of public engagement. Drawing on the conceptual framework of input, throughput and output of public participation, this panel aims at bringing together and discussing the quality of public dialogue in terms of openness and access; quality of deliberation; effectiveness and efficacy; and publicity and accountability.

Important information about the conference:

General info: http://www.4sonline.org/meeting

Submission of papers: http://convention2.allacademic.com/one/ssss/4s13/

Deadline for submission: March 17, 2013

Acceptance notification: May 12, 2013

Graphic

text